![]() Mine are also compressed RAW images (Canon, not Sony). Counting from when the first spinning icon appeared, the total time for all 3 was 24.86 or about 8.5 seconds per. With just 3 images, it took multiple runs until they all succeeded without any processing errors. I counted the time only when the rotating icon is going and skipped any timing if a processing error occurred. From then on, each additional image starts up right when the previous image finishes, unless there’s a processing error, in which case there’s a delay as PL recovers from the error. Then the clock icon on the image turns into a spinning icon. Here’s how I timed it: PL seems to spend some time setting up. I’m on PL 5, so I’m just using Deep Prime, but I just processed an image in 8.29 seconds, and I’m the OP with the old, slow, error-prone Radeon RX 580. I am exporting with DeepPrime XD for my Sony A74 lossless compressed raw at around 10 secs each photo. Using a Nvidia 3070 and the results have been perfect. While typing this, I processed 19 images of my Canon EOS M50 without a problem But the previous release, 22.10.3, turns out to be quite stable with the change made above. The latest version, 22.11.2, is really instable. Last but definitely not least: performance and stability differs per AMD driver release. The second the last option is GPU Workload.On the bottom of the page, you’ll find a collapsible menu Advanced.In the AMD Radeon software, go to settings (the gear icon in the upper right corner).I assume you have AMD Software Adrenaline Edition installed and set to English. Next, you can change a setting in the AMD Software. OpenCL in combination with the RX 480 has been very instable on my machine. There are some settings that can be tweaked that really improved the stability of my RX 480 in DxO PL without resulting in less performance or error in other applications.įirst of all, disable OpenCL in the DxO PL settings. Your RX 580 more or less is a more efficient RX 480. Some identical graphics cards, with not dissimilar machine hardware seem to produce different results (just like some of mine, oops!?) I have run my own tests because I feel that there are conflicting results in the spreadsheet. I was hoping that the RTX3060 would prove slightly better than the RTX2060 but the speed of the Ryzen of my Grandson’ machine must also be taken into consideration! I have yet to run a test with the new graphics card using the USB3 SATA SSD because the installation has “broken” the front USB3 hub (dislodged a power cable I suspect). Hence the lower two rows of tables are all without any selection of ‘Denoising’, two runs looking for consistency which appears to be consistently absent? The very last test with NVME was run after the installation of the new graphics card but that card should play no part in those exports and I my bios reverted to default during the installation and I have not fully restored the slight processor overclock? In all cases the exported files were written back to the same device but in a separate directory ![]() My tests on my machines were carried out with the ‘Performance’ ‘Preferences’ option set to 4 which seems to cause an increase in export times so I have repeated some tests with both but have standardised on 2 as being the recommended and best option.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |